| 29 | 0 | 75 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
达尔其油田产出污水存在离子成分复杂(高矿化度、低Ca2+/Mg2+)、高悬浮物、高含油的问题,针对原有水处理工艺难以使出水水质达到回注标准的难题,构建了“预氧化-硬度调节-PAFS絮凝”协同处理体系。通过系统考察预氧化剂(NaClO)、硬度调节剂(Ca(OH)2)、絮凝剂(PAFS)的添加浓度及反应时间等关键参数对污水处理效能的影响,确定最优工艺条件。实验结果表明,依次加入30 mg/L NaClO、80 mg/L Ca(OH)2、150 mg/L PAFS,且絮凝反应60 min时,污水中悬浮物浓度由初始的273 mg/L降至9.5 mg/L(去除率96.5%),含油量由89 mg/L降至8.4 mg/L(去除率90.6%),实现了低药剂浓度下污染物的高效去除。处理后的水质完全满足SY/T 5329—2022Ⅱ级回注要求,该技术在保障水质达标的同时有效控制了处理成本,为低Ca2+/Mg2+、高悬浮物、高含油采出污水的处理提供了经济可行的解决方案。
Abstract:The produced wastewater from the Da′erqi Oilfield exhibits complex ionic composition(high mineralization, low Ca2+/Mg2+), high suspended solids, and high oil content. To address the challenge that the original water treatment process is hard to make the effluent quality meet the reinjection standards, this study established the “pre-oxidation-hardness adjustment-PAFS flocculation” synergistic treatment system. By systematically investigating the effects of key parameters, which include the addition concentrations of pre-oxidant(NaClO), hardness regulator(Ca(OH)2), and flocculant(PAFS), as well as reaction time on wastewater treatment efficiency, the optimal process conditions were determined. The experimental results showed that when 30 mg/L NaClO, 80 mg/L Ca(OH)2, and 150 mg/L PAFS were added sequentially, and the flocculation reaction lasted for 60 minutes, the suspended solid concentration in the wastewater decreased from the initial 273 mg/L to 9.5 mg/L(removal rate of 96.5%). The oil content decreased from 89 mg/L to 8.4 mg/L(with a removal rate of 90.6%), achieving efficient removal of pollutants at low reagent concentrations. The treated water fully complies with SY/T 5329—2022 Grade Ⅱ reinjection requirements.. While ensuring that the water quality meets the standard, this technology effectively controls the treatment cost, providing an economically feasible solution for the treatment of produced wastewater with low Ca2+/Mg2+, high suspended solids, and high oil content.
[1] 罗义.预氧化污水处理技术[J].油气田地面工程,2014,33(6):55-56.
[2] 李孝坤.预氧化技术在油田污水处理中的应用[J].油气田地面工程,2015,34(8):37-38.
[3] 雷晓玲,秦颖,文永林,等.预氧化强化混凝工艺处理含锰水实验研究[J].应用化工,2022,51(1):110-113.
[4] 龙伟,张芹,向贵锋,等.水硬度对细粒赤铁矿絮凝沉降效果的影响[J].金属矿山,2016,45(12):134-137.
[5] NTWAMPE I O,JEWELL L L,GLASSER D.The effect of water hardness on paint wastewater treatment by coagulation-flocculation[J].Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology,2013,5(1):7-16.
[6] 曾睿,张芹,苟宝,等.钙镁离子对细粒赤铁矿絮凝行为的影响[J].金属矿山,2018,47(1):84-87.
[7] BASAK N,CHAUDHARI S K,SHARMA D K.Impact of varying Ca/Mg waters on ionic balance,dispersion,and clay flocculation of salt-affected soils[J].Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2015,46(7):827-844.
[8] 路绪迁,高桂玥,范雨萱,等.煤气化细渣基聚合硅酸铝铁絮凝剂的制备与性能研究[J].齐鲁工业大学学报,2024,38(5):1-10.
[9] 任园园,陈富金,李国斌,等.聚硅酸铝铁絮凝剂研究进展[J].硅酸盐通报,2018,37(6):1924-1928.
[10] 薛笑莉,李瑞丰,张瑞士,等.聚硅酸铝铁、聚合氯化铝、聚合硫酸铁絮凝效果的比较[J].天津化工,2005,19(4):40-42.
[11] 钟传蓉,冯明石,曾光玉,等.页岩压裂返排液的预处理及絮凝剂的溶液结构[J].化工进展,2022,41(9):5109-5114.
[12] 贺远鹏.响应曲面法复配混凝剂处理海上生产返排液[J].化工进展,2021,40(z1):439-445.
[13] 何南浩.南方某水厂微污染含藻水的强化混凝处理试验研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2019.
[14] 柳建华.絮凝剂溶解液的制备与分析[J].洁净煤技术,2012,18(5):10-12.
[15] 谢飞,吴明,陈旭,等.油田注水系统结垢腐蚀机理[J].油气储运,2010,29(12):896-899.
[16] KAMAL M S,HUSSEIN I,MAHMOUD M,et al.Oilfield scale formation and chemical removal:A review[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,171:127-139.
[17] 蒋继辉,冀忠伦,任小荣,等.聚合硅酸铝铁絮凝剂处理油井压裂废水[J].化工环保,2013,33(4):363-366.
[18] 石文杰.无机絮凝剂聚合硅酸铝铁的制备[J].中国石油石化,2017,10(369):92-93.
[19] 闫会,张岩,李风琪,等.絮凝技术用于高有机物海水预处理的研究[J].广东化工,2016,43(23):55-57.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X741
引用信息:
[1]王晓颖.预氧化-硬度调节-PAFS絮凝组合工艺处理低Ca~(2+)/Mg~(2+)油田产出污水研究[J].安全、健康和环境,2025,25(12):30-36.
基金信息:
中国石化“十条龙”科技攻关项目(QDLY2304-04),陆相致密/页岩气地面工程及探评建一体化成本管控技术研究